Skip to content

Conversation

@scholzj
Copy link
Member

@scholzj scholzj commented Oct 25, 2025

Type of change

  • Enhancement / new feature

Description

This PR implements the Strimzi Proposal 123 and removes the default preferred pod-anti-affinity rules when rack awareness is used.

This should resolve #11509.

Checklist

  • Write tests
  • Make sure all tests pass
  • Update documentation
  • Try your changes from Pod inside your Kubernetes and OpenShift cluster, not just locally
  • Reference relevant issue(s) and close them after merging
  • Update CHANGELOG.md

@scholzj scholzj added this to the 0.49.0 milestone Oct 25, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.79%. Comparing base (8f39d33) to head (6fd0824).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main   #12073   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     74.78%   74.79%           
+ Complexity     6615     6609    -6     
=========================================
  Files           376      376           
  Lines         25325    25301   -24     
  Branches       3389     3387    -2     
=========================================
- Hits          18939    18923   -16     
+ Misses         5000     4992    -8     
  Partials       1386     1386           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...mzi/operator/cluster/model/KafkaBridgeCluster.java 93.33% <100.00%> (-0.17%) ⬇️
...o/strimzi/operator/cluster/model/KafkaCluster.java 92.41% <100.00%> (-0.18%) ⬇️
...zi/operator/cluster/model/KafkaConnectCluster.java 91.47% <100.00%> (-0.12%) ⬇️
.../io/strimzi/operator/cluster/model/ModelUtils.java 85.81% <100.00%> (+1.87%) ⬆️

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@scholzj
Copy link
Member Author

scholzj commented Oct 25, 2025

/gha run pipeline=regression kubeVersion=latest

@github-actions
Copy link

⏳ System test verification started: link

The following 6 job(s) will be executed:

  • regression-brokers-and-security-amd64 (oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-x86-64)
  • regression-operators-amd64 (oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-x86-64)
  • regression-operands-amd64 (oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-x86-64)
  • regression-brokers-and-security-arm64 (oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-arm64)
  • regression-operators-arm64 (oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-arm64)
  • regression-operands-arm64 (oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-arm64)

Tests will start after successful build completion.

@github-actions
Copy link

❌ System test verification failed: link

Signed-off-by: Jakub Scholz <[email protected]>
@scholzj
Copy link
Member Author

scholzj commented Oct 26, 2025

/azp run regression

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@scholzj
Copy link
Member Author

scholzj commented Oct 26, 2025

/gha run pipeline=regression kubeVersion=latest

@github-actions
Copy link

⏳ System test verification started: link

The following 6 job(s) will be executed:

  • regression-brokers-and-security-amd64 (oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-x86-64)
  • regression-operators-amd64 (oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-x86-64)
  • regression-operands-amd64 (oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-x86-64)
  • regression-brokers-and-security-arm64 (oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-arm64)
  • regression-operators-arm64 (oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-arm64)
  • regression-operands-arm64 (oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-arm64)

Tests will start after successful build completion.

@github-actions
Copy link

❌ System test verification failed: link

@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 System test verification passed: link

Signed-off-by: Jakub Scholz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Scholz <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@ppatierno ppatierno left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Just one nit.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Scholz <[email protected]>
@scholzj scholzj removed the request for review from katheris October 27, 2025 17:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Incorrect default pod antiaffinity for NodePools

2 participants